TL;DR: Up to 82% of people experience imposter syndrome, and PhD students are among the most affected. But it is not a character flaw – it is a signal that belonging is missing. The PhD environment produces imposter feelings through isolation, infrequent feedback, and constant comparison. Individual coping strategies help, but the real antidote is structural: finding a peer community that normalises the struggle.
Written by Max Lempriere, founder of The PhD People, who has worked with over 500 doctoral researchers since 2017.
In 1978, psychologists Pauline Clance and Suzanne Imes gave a name to something millions of high-achieving people already knew: the persistent feeling that you are a fraud, that your success is down to luck, and that sooner or later someone will find you out. They called it the imposter phenomenon. Nearly fifty years later, research suggests that up to 82% of people experience it at some point, and PhD students are among the most affected groups in higher education (Chakraverty, 2020).
You sit down at your desk and the first thought is: everyone else here is smarter than me. You read a paper and think you should have written it already. You get positive feedback from your supervisor and spend the rest of the day convinced they were being kind. You compare yourself to colleagues who seem to produce effortlessly while you agonise over every paragraph.
Here’s the thing. Imposter syndrome is not a flaw in your character. It is a signal that something is missing. And that something is belonging.
What is imposter syndrome, and why is it so common in PhD students?
Imposter syndrome is the gap between what you have achieved and what you believe you deserve. It is the internal voice that says your place on the programme was a mistake, your work is not good enough, and your peers are the real scholars. It is exhausting, and it is remarkably common.
The PhD environment is almost perfectly designed to produce it. You are surrounded by experts who have decades more experience. Your progress is measured in ways that are often unclear: how do you know if a chapter is “good enough” when the goalposts keep moving? You spend long periods working alone, with limited feedback, and the feedback you do get often focuses on what needs improving rather than what you have done well.
The Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) has consistently shown that isolation and poor wellbeing are among the most reported challenges for doctoral researchers in the UK. The 2023 PRES data found that only 59% of respondents felt part of a research community. That means four in ten PhD students feel they do not belong in the place where they are supposed to be doing the most important work of their academic lives.
Most advice on imposter syndrome tells you to fix your thinking. Keep a success journal. Challenge your negative thoughts. Remind yourself of your achievements. And there is nothing wrong with that advice, as far as it goes. But what if the problem is not how you think? What if the problem is how you work?
It’s not you. It’s the system
The modern PhD was built on a model that assumed something it no longer provides: a departmental community. Fifty years ago, most doctoral researchers were full-time, campus-based, and embedded in a cohort of peers. They shared offices, attended seminars, went to the pub on Fridays. The structure of the PhD assumed that belonging would happen naturally, as a byproduct of proximity.
That world has largely disappeared. Today, more PhD students than ever are part-time, distance-learning, or international. Departmental budgets have been cut. Supervisors are overworked and under-resourced. Seminar cultures have thinned out. The infrastructure that used to create community has been quietly dismantled, but the PhD itself still assumes it exists.
The result is an isolation pipeline. You work alone. You get no regular peer feedback. Nobody normalises the struggle for you. And in the absence of people who mirror your experience back to you, imposter feelings intensify. You have no way of knowing that the student you admire from across the seminar room went home last night and stared at a blank screen for three hours, just like you did.
This is not a minor inconvenience. This week on Reddit, several PhD students described experiences that illustrate the pattern: an advisor denied tenure, leaving their students in limbo with no institutional support; a student refused extensions after losing a parent, told that “everyone goes through hard times”; a second-year researcher burning out from constant activity with no time to think. In each case, the institution failed to provide what the student needed. And in each case, the student’s first instinct was to question themselves rather than the system.
The phrase that keeps coming back, in our workshops and in research on doctoral experience: the institution is the problem, not the student.
Why belonging is the antidote to imposter syndrome
In 2011, Gregory Walton and Geoffrey Cohen published a study that changed how researchers think about academic underperformance. They gave first-year university students a brief intervention: stories from older students describing how feelings of not belonging were normal and temporary. That was it. No therapy, no skills training, no mentoring programme. Just the knowledge that other people had felt the same way and had come through.
The results were striking. Students who received the belonging intervention showed improved grades, better health, and greater wellbeing over the following three years, with the strongest effects among students from underrepresented groups. A follow-up by Good, Rattan, and Dweck (2012) found similar patterns in STEM subjects: a sense of belonging was a stronger predictor of intention to stay in the field than grades or self-efficacy.
This points to imposter syndrome being a belonging problem, rather than (just) a confidence problem.
When you are part of a community of peers who understand your experience, several things happen at once. Your struggle gets normalised, you discover that the person you thought had it all figured out is also awake at 2am questioning their methodology, you get feedback that is not attached to a grade or an assessment. And because of that, you start to see yourself as someone who belongs, because the people around you treat you as though you do.
Individual coping strategies have their place. Journaling, self-talk, therapy: these help, and anyone who finds them useful should keep using them. But they are treating symptoms, not causes. If imposter syndrome is produced by isolation, then the antidote is not better self-management. The antidote is connection.
The difference is structural. Individual strategies ask: “How can I change how I feel?” Belonging asks: “How can I change the conditions that make me feel this way?”
What actually helps with PhD imposter syndrome
If imposter syndrome is a belonging problem, then the solutions need to be structural, not just psychological. Here is what the research and our experience with over 500 doctoral researchers has shown works.
Find your people. Not your supervisor, not your department, not a generic university wellbeing service. A peer community of PhD students at a similar stage to you, who understand what it is like to stare at a paragraph for an hour and still not be sure if it makes sense. People who get it, without you having to explain.
Write with others. One of the most consistent findings in our community is that writing alone is harder than it needs to be. Co-working, sometimes called body-doubling, normalises the struggle in real time. You see other people pausing, rereading, deleting, starting again. You realise it is not just you. This week alone, 50 PhD students sat down to write together in our sessions. Nobody asked them to be there. They chose to show up because writing alone was not working.
Talk about it openly. Not as a confession, not as a weakness, but as a shared experience. In our experience, the single most powerful moment in any workshop is when someone says “I thought it was just me” and the chat fills with people saying “me too.” That is belonging in action. You can read more about that pattern in our post on shared struggle.
Question the system, not yourself. When you feel like a fraud, ask: “Am I getting the support I need?” not “Am I good enough?” If the answer is no, that is information about the system, not about you. We have written about how some institutions get this wrong and what the consequences look like.
Build belonging deliberately. It will not happen by accident in most PhD programmes. The structures that used to create it have eroded, and most universities have not replaced them. You need to seek it out. This is why the loneliness of the PhD is not a personal failing but a structural gap. And it is why the crisis of confidence in doctoral programmes is not going to be solved by telling students to think more positively.
Frequently asked questions
Is imposter syndrome common in PhD students?
Research by Chakraverty (2020) found that imposter syndrome is widespread among doctoral researchers, with prevalence significantly higher than in the general population. The combination of constant evaluation, ambiguous progress markers, and isolated working conditions makes the PhD environment a breeding ground for imposter feelings.
What causes imposter syndrome during a PhD?
The main drivers are structural: isolation, lack of peer community, infrequent feedback, constant comparison with more experienced researchers, and a culture that normalises overwork while stigmatising struggle. It is not caused by a deficit in the student; it is caused by a deficit in the system.
How do I overcome PhD imposter syndrome?
The most effective approaches are structural rather than purely psychological. Finding a peer community, writing with others, and talking openly about your experience are all supported by research (Walton and Cohen, 2011). Individual strategies like journaling and self-reflection can help, but they work best alongside belonging-based interventions.
Is imposter syndrome a sign I should quit my PhD?
No. Imposter syndrome is a sign that you are working in a challenging, high-stakes environment without enough support. It says nothing about your ability or your right to be there. If you are questioning whether to continue, it is worth reading our honest guide to quitting a PhD to help separate the signal from the noise. The answer is usually not to quit – it is to find the support the system should have given you in the first place.
You don’t have to work this out alone
If any of this sounds familiar, you are not unusual. You are having a rational response to an irrational system. The PhD was not designed for the way most people now study, and the support structures have not caught up.
The PhD Common Room exists because of this gap. It is a peer community of over 150 PhD students from every subject and every stage, with daily writing sessions, expert-led workshops, and the kind of support your supervisor and department should be providing but probably are not. Members pay between £30 and £75 a month.
If you are not ready for that, our Monday Focus Sessions are a good place to start: four hours of structured writing alongside other PhD students, for £14 per session.
What would change if you stopped trying to fix yourself and started looking for where you belong?
0 Comments