701 hours of writing and nobody asked them to be there

Dr. Max Lempriere
Read in 3 minutes

Every chapter of your thesis, mapped onto a single page.

I asked 250 PhD examiners how they'd structure a thesis if they were starting again. Their answers fit on a single page. Download it free — and stop staring at a blank document wondering where to begin.

You keep coming back. There's a reason for that.

Come write with us live. Join the next Monday Focus Session — 9am UK time this Monday.

In January, we opened a Zoom room and left it running. No facilitator. No fixed schedule. No timed sprints or check-ins or accountability prompts. Just an open room, available around the clock, where doctoral researchers could show up and write.

Three months in, I pulled the data. 701 participant-hours of writing in March. Thirty-eight writers. Every day of the week. And nobody asked any of them to be there.

What the numbers say

We called it the 24/7 Writing Cafe. It is part of The PhD Common Room, our PhD writing community for doctoral researchers. The Common Room already offers daily writing sessions, live workshops, and mentoring. But the cafe is different. It has no structure at all.

In March, those 38 writers logged 371 separate sessions. Tuesdays and Wednesdays are the busiest days, averaging nine writers each. But the spread is what got me. People are in there at 6am. People are in there at 10pm. Every single day of the week has activity, including Saturdays and Sundays.

The busiest hour is Monday at 4pm. The second busiest is Tuesday at 9am. There is a clear afternoon peak across the whole week between 3pm and 5pm, but the mornings are busy too, especially mid-week.

And on Saturdays, the cafe logged 81 participant-hours. On Sundays, 55. Nobody scheduled those sessions. Nobody prompted them. The room was just there, and people came.

What the numbers do not say

The data tells you when people write. It does not tell you why they keep coming back.

I have run writing sessions for PhD students for eight years now. The facilitated sessions work. The structured retreats work. The bootcamps produce an average of 17,500 words in four days. Structure has value.

But the cafe has none of that. No facilitator welcomes you when you arrive. Nobody tells you when to start or stop. There are no introductions, no check-ins, no debrief. You join, you write, you leave when you are done.

And yet, people keep coming back. One writer logged 51 hours in March alone, averaging 82 minutes across 37 separate visits. Another sat down twice and wrote for nearly four hours straight each time. These are not casual drop-ins. These are people who have built the cafe into their working week.

The question is why.

What it actually looks like

You open the Zoom link at 7am because the house is still quiet and this is the only hour that belongs to you. Someone else is already there, camera off, typing. You do not speak to them. You do not need to. You open your chapter, put your head down, and write.

Or it is Saturday afternoon. You told yourself you would get through the discussion section this weekend, but you have been staring at the same paragraph for twenty minutes. You open the cafe. Three other people are working. You do not know their names, you do not know their topics, but you know they are doing the same thing you are doing. And somehow that is enough to get you moving again.

That is what 701 hours of unstructured writing looks like. Not a programme. Not a course. Just a room where other people are writing, available whenever you need it.

The thing that structure cannot give you

PhDs are lonely. Most doctoral researchers work alone, in their own home, on a project that almost nobody around them fully understands. The isolation is not a side effect of the PhD. It is a defining feature of it.

And most of the support that exists for PhD students is structured. Workshops. Seminars. Supervision meetings. Skills training. All of it has a start time and an end time and an agenda and an expected outcome.

That structure is useful. But it does something the cafe does not. It tells you when to show up.

The cafe asks a different question. It asks: when do you actually want to write? And the answer, from the data, is: all the time. Early mornings, late evenings, weekends. Not because someone told them to, but because they wanted to not be alone while they did it.

That is not a productivity preference. That is a belonging need.

What this tells us about a PhD writing community

There is a version of doctoral support that treats the PhD as a series of problems to solve. You need to learn how to write a literature review. You need feedback on your methodology chapter. You need to practise for your viva. And all of that is true.

But there is another need that runs underneath all of it. The need to feel like you are not doing this on your own. The need to know that someone else is working at the same time as you, even if you never speak to them. The need for presence without performance.

What some institutions get wrong about PhD support is that they try to solve the isolation problem with more structure. More workshops, more training, more scheduled contact hours. And those things have their place. But they do not address the gap between the scheduled moments. The 6am start before the rest of the house wakes up. The Saturday afternoon when you are trying to hit a chapter deadline. The Wednesday evening when the words finally start coming.

Those are the moments when doctoral researchers most need to not be alone. And no institutional timetable covers them.

An open room is enough

We did not design the cafe with any of this in mind. It was an experiment. I wanted to see what would happen if we stripped everything back and just left the door open.

What happened is that 38 people walked through it. They wrote 701 hours of thesis between them. They came back day after day. And they did it entirely on their own terms.

I think that tells us something important. Not about productivity tools or accountability systems or writing techniques. About what doctoral researchers actually need from the people and spaces around them.

They need somewhere to go. They need it to be available when they need it, not when someone else decides they should need it. And they need other people to be there, doing the same thing, even if nobody says a word.

And when the cafe gives you the hours but the chapter still feels shapeless, the practical work of getting your PhD thesis structure right is a useful next step.

The 24/7 Writing Cafe is available to all members of The PhD Common Room. Joining takes less than two minutes. You get the cafe, daily facilitated writing sessions, live workshops, and mentoring. Membership starts at £30 a month, with no contract and a 28-day money-back guarantee. If the cafe is the kind of space you have been looking for, it is already there.

What kind of PhD researcher are you?

Learn what’s actually making your PhD hard — and what to do about it.

This free assessment takes four minutes and involves twelve questions. Here's what you'll get:

  • Your doctoral profile — personalised to your answers
  • A personalised PDF report with a clear explanation of what's making your PhD hard
  • Specific recommendations based on where you actually are

Comments

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *